The story so far ..
The Fed has so far purchased $ 2.5
trillion in assets since December 2008 and its balancesheet continues to
rapidly balloon in size as, in the third round of bond purchases under the
quantitative-easing stimulus strategy, it continues its $ 85 billion monthly
purchase of Treasuries and Mortgage-backed bonds. The Fed isnt acting in
isolation. Policy makers around the world (including the Fed) have pumped in
more than $ 6 trillion into the global economy through asset purchases,
increasing their balance sheet assets to $ 14.09 trillion as of June 2012. This
is up from $ 4.99 trillion in May 2006!
These asset purchases were largely
driven by the Fed’s policies. All policy moves by the Fed so far, ZIRP, QE1,
QE2, Operation Twist and ‘Infinite’ QE3, were aimed at stimulating a sluggish economy. In the initial phases, fears were rife that
the first two rounds of Quantitative Easing were nothing but the Fed trying to
‘monetize its debt’ (Central banks in most developed nations, like UK, US and Japan for instance, are
forbidden by law to buy government debt directly from the government and must
instead buy it from the secondary market. Thus a two-step process, where the
government sells bonds to private entities which the central bank then buys). Bernanke has been earnest in his appeals
however that the easing was to stimulate the economy and not to finance
government spending (and I guess, we will have to take his word for that!).
...Operation Twist
...Operation Twist
This was followed by Operation
Twist - A attempt to flatten the yield curve by selling short term debt and
using the proceeds to finance the purchase of longer dated treasuries. While
this may be just what the doctor ordered to keeping the balance sheet from
ballooning any further, Operation Twist has a severe limitation. To finance the
purchase of longer dated securities you need to have an inventory of short
dated securities to sell. Unfortunately, the Fed will soon run out of short term
bonds to sell. What then? What do you do
when you no longer have 0-3 year bonds to sell? Simple, you start selling the
longer dated bonds from your portfolio. The Fed had until now indicated that
the plan was to keep the Federal Funds rate at the zero range atleast until mid
2015. Its very likely that the ZIRP will be further extended in time.
The objective of ‘unlimited’ QE3 (While
continuing its purchase of $ 40 billion per month of MBS, the Fed will also buy
$ 45 billion of Treasury Debt every month; The second part of the plan replaces
Operation Twist) was to put downward pressure on long-term interest rates. Much
like the two phases of easing announced earlier. On September 7, 2012, the Friday
before QE3 was announced, the yield on the 10-year Treasuries was 1.67%. On
September 14, the day after the QE3 announcement, it had surged up to 1.88%.
This was not the desired effect and it
is possible that this may have been due to investors flocking to riskier
assets like equities and high yield debt from treasuries.
Bernanke may rest easy in the fact that the 10 year yield averaged 1.79 percent in 2012. The average in 2011 was 2.77 per cent!The average yield registered in 2012 is still significantly greater than the record low of 1.379 percent on July 25, 2012 at the height of Europe’s sovereign debt crisis.
Bernanke may rest easy in the fact that the 10 year yield averaged 1.79 percent in 2012. The average in 2011 was 2.77 per cent!The average yield registered in 2012 is still significantly greater than the record low of 1.379 percent on July 25, 2012 at the height of Europe’s sovereign debt crisis.
By late 2012, unprecedented
stimulus by the ECB had tempered the sovereign crisis in Europe and curtailed
the demand for safe haven assets like Gold and Treasuries. 10 year yields seem to have plateaued at sub-2 levels, so is there really a case for purchasing
treasuries at the moment?
.. and onto Messrs Gross and Fink
.. and onto Messrs Gross and Fink
That brings us to the two gentlemen in
the subject of this post. One of them is pugnaciously long on treasuries. Bill Gross, who
runs the world’s largest bond fund, raised the percentage of Treasuries held in
his flagship Total Return Fund to 26 per cent in December 2012, up from 23 per
cent of assets in November. MBS still remains the flagship fund’s largest
holding, though its proportion has reduced to 42 percent from 44 percent since
October 2011. Gross has stated that he would steer clear from longer-dated
treasuries as inflationary effects of the Fed’s massive scale of Quantitative
Easing will be felt many years later. PIMCO, with $1.92 trillion in assets
under management, is primarily a fixed income manager. So this is one really
monstrous bet on treasuries by Gross, who co-founded the firm in 1971 (Gross
incidentally is one of the rare few fixed income managers to have got in, more
than thirty years ago, on the ground
floor of this spectacular bond rally). But even best laid plans can sometimes go wrong.
Gross had apologized to his investors in 2011 after, earlier in that year, he had sold all his treasury holdings. Yep. He had reduced his holdings in treasuries to zero by March 2011! Why? It was because he believed then that the Fed would stop buying bonds at the end of June 2011 as its QE2 program wound down. Gross watched his worst nightmare come true as the Fed announced a continuation of its quantitative easing program. A few months later, an extraordinary tail risk emerged, sending shock-waves across the world. The US had lost its prized AAA rating! However, amidst the shock-and-awe, the world didnt end as we thought it would and far from triggering an exodus from Treasuries, investors piled into US Treasuries. As equity markets worldwide crumbled, the US treasuries were perceived as the ultimate safe haven by stunned investors seeking refuge from wealth destruction and increased volatility. Yields tumbled swiftly and Gross was left to rue his short treasury postion. With an approach that can best be categorized as extreme risk-averseness, will things turn out differently for him this time around?
Gross had apologized to his investors in 2011 after, earlier in that year, he had sold all his treasury holdings. Yep. He had reduced his holdings in treasuries to zero by March 2011! Why? It was because he believed then that the Fed would stop buying bonds at the end of June 2011 as its QE2 program wound down. Gross watched his worst nightmare come true as the Fed announced a continuation of its quantitative easing program. A few months later, an extraordinary tail risk emerged, sending shock-waves across the world. The US had lost its prized AAA rating! However, amidst the shock-and-awe, the world didnt end as we thought it would and far from triggering an exodus from Treasuries, investors piled into US Treasuries. As equity markets worldwide crumbled, the US treasuries were perceived as the ultimate safe haven by stunned investors seeking refuge from wealth destruction and increased volatility. Yields tumbled swiftly and Gross was left to rue his short treasury postion. With an approach that can best be categorized as extreme risk-averseness, will things turn out differently for him this time around?
The answer to that question may
well lie in the world of extreme risk. In February 2012, Larry Fink, the CEO of
BlackRock, made a statement that sounded ludicrous then. He said ‘investors
should have 100 percent of investments in equities because of valuations
and higher returns than bonds’.
(c) Avinash Menon